If then, physical matter is not the basic stuff of the universe, but energy is, then a significant question can be posed; at least for hypothetical consideration? Why should any life system emerge on any planet only in a strictly three-dimensional physical context and with sensing systems geared uniquely and only to perceiving the physical forms of matter? This question can be posed in a number of other ways.
For example, since energy is the fundamental constituent of physical matter, why should life forms consist only of the matter and not the energy? Or, if life forms are fundamentally erected out of energy, why should they only possess sensory systems regarding matter, and not possess sensory systems regarding energies?
The most comprehensive, and logical, answer is that all life systems have arrays of sensing mechanisms and faculties regarding both matter and energy-and in fact it is understood that all life forms are probably more sensitive overall to energies than to physical matter. This equates to two sets of sensing systems, one geared for perceiving the physical, the other geared for perceiving the energetic.
Of course, in the behaviouristic context, energy sensing is often explained away as subliminal responses to "cues" of body language and behavior posturing. Such cues play an obvious role, but the responses often occur over distances when the direct sighting of body cues is not possible. For clarity here, if one senses another's vibes, then those vibes are emanating from the other person's aura energy fields. In that one is sensing invisible energies in this case, such sensing is a form of telepathic energy transference. People possess energy sensing systems with regard to emotions radiating from the energy fields of others, such as emanations of love, hate, acceptance and rejection, danger, approachability, imminent illness or death.
Intuition and its associated sensing systems cannot be based only on the five physical senses. For example, the sensing of love, hate, and also sexual availability are not functions of the five physical senses, and neither is the sensing of stealth, activity, secrecy, duplicity, truth, falsehood, and even the sensing of another's power. Most people realize that they possess sensing systems, but they seldom realize how or why. If the prospective of multiple human sensing systems is considered, all human beings can be thought of as composites of self-propulsion, walking, talking, and thinking sensing systems. Within that context, the sensing systems can be said to exist in everyone. It is only their automatic "self propulsion" that has been dumbed down, or become latently ineffectual. However it is entirely probable that a degree of automatic self-propulsion can at least be somewhat reactivated, by simply becoming aware of what sensing systems have actually become latent.
Up until about twenty years ago, the existence of these dumbed down sensing systems, would have to be hypothetically argued via psychical and para-psychological contexts. It is no longer necessary to argue for the existence of extensive human sensing systems in hypothetical terms. The reason for this is that knowledge regarding the nature of human sensing systems has dramatically increased, not in parapsychology but, believe it or not, in the sciences proper.
It is now scientifically clear that the human possesses not just the five standard sensing systems, but also very many more of very different kinds. It should be understood, that previous scientific argument against the existence of human sensing systems and their existence, centred on one particular aspect. If sensing systems, such as those having to do with intuition etc, were to be admitted as existing, then there needed to be receptors for them.
For the eye systems there are receptors for light and form. For the ears, there are systems with receptors for sound. The nose system has receptors for smell, the tongue system receptors for taste, and there are receptors on the skin for tactile impression or physical feeling. That was the scientific extent of human sensing receptors until the development of the electron microscope made it possible to discover other kinds of receptors on and within the human biological organism. For clarity, a receptor is defined as "a cell or a group of cells that can receive interpretable stimuli".
Rick Collingwood Personal Hypnotherapy CDs & MP3s
Multiple ARIA Award winning hypnosis programs proven to work! Titles include weight loss, quit smoking, insomnia cure, stress management + many more.
Post a Comment